About Me

Name: Michael Scotto
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Six Degrees Away From Design

The National Geographic Channel is running a series titled “Six Degrees Could Change the World.” They endeavor to show how conditions on earth would change as the planet’s temperature increases. We are taken up one degree at a time until we reach six degrees warmer. The assumption of course is that the earth is warming and we are facing disaster because conservatives refuse to use “earth bags” at the grocery store. However, I don’t want to address that tired topic here.

I am concerned with the glaring illogic in holding to the idea that the earth’s ecosystem happened utterly and completely by accident while maintaining that it is currently in the most advantageous place it could be for life to thrive. The earth’s distance from the sun, the makeup of the atmosphere, the earth’s axis and rotation speed, the distance to the moon, the size of the moon, the magnetic field… I could for on for pages. All of this nailed to a tiny window of temperature. 

The show should be called “Six Degrees Away from Design.”

Well, a blog is no place to argue evolution (not for me anyway). I’m just baffled by people who believe that all humans are just accidents. We’re here for no reason, by no design, to accomplish nothing in particular. Each thought is merely a chemical reaction; a sort of odd “stimulus-response” reaction over which no one has control. And if life is merely an accident with no purpose, what does it matter what form it takes or if it takes any form at all? We are no different than moon dust. Why not "27 degrees could change the world?" Why does human survival matter?

“Six Degrees Could Change the World” only affirms what I discovered years ago: the earth is an extremely complex greenhouse that is a wonder to behold. It is no accident, it has a purpose and it has been designed.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Democratic "Race" for President

Democrats Obsessed With Race, Gender

At the start of his campaign, Barack Obama stated that he believed that America was "ready" to consider an African-American for the presidency. America may be ready, but is the Democratic Party ready?

As noted previously on this blog, the Democrats are obsessed with matters of race and gender. Plain white guy John Edwards exited the race "so history can be made.." All the pundits are busy examining the exit polls, separating Democrat voters into groups such as "blacks," "Hispanics," single mothers" and "blue-collar white males." Compare that with the Republican exit polls. The GOP is primarily examined in terms of "Evangelicals," "Conservatives," "security voters" and other politically-oriented classes.

I don't like these sorts of divisions, but cable news has to fill 24 hours.

The Left, however, only sees the world in terms of race and gender (even their class warfare is couched in racial language). To the Left we are nothing more that a member of some group over which we have little or no control. Even for those groups over which we do have choice (religion, etc.) the Left still reduces us to simplistic "voting blocs." They are thoroughly sexist, racist, ethnicist and any other "ist" you can imagine (Marxist?). That is not an empty charge. Define any of those terms and then turn on cable news and listen to the Dems.

Defining individuals by their sex, race or ethnicity is what they do. Sexists, racists and ethnicists are what they are.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain Staffer: "We Beat You"

Conservatives are McCain's Opponents... According to His People

This is a must-hear: SANTORUM

If McCain's people view conservatives as people to be referred to in the second or third person, then they can have it that way. McCain's arrogance and the arrogance of his campaign might even drive me to support Romney (if there is anything left to be decided in May when NC hold our primary).

For the first time since I've had the vote (1984) I'm considering a third-party candidate.

If liberals, moderates and the GOP establishment want their party back, they can have it. Nixon and Ford were great, weren't they?


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »