About Me

Name: Michael Scotto
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Wal-Mart Refuses to Take Stand on Justification!

Target Silent on a Literal Interpretation of Genesis!

So Sam's Club/Wal-Mart has decided not to use the word "Christmas" again this year. They have also entered into a partnership of sorts with the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce. All of this has the American Family Association quite upset.

The affiliation with the gay group is puzzling, but a national retailer staying above the fray in the "Christmas-Holiday" debate doesn't strike me as odd (or even mildly offensive).

I must admit that I am a conservative Evangelical Christian who dates the birth of Christ at about September 29 (conception on December 25). I have no problem with individual Christians "celebrating" either the birth or the incarnation of our Lord. Be that as it may, why should I care if Wal-Mart uses "Christmas" or not? Should retailers present us with doctrinal statements?

I bet Wal-Mart refuses to take a stand against the Council of Trent as well. Then again, most Christians I know won't come out against Trent so why does it matter what Wal-Mart does with a made-up "Holy Day" anyway?

We bemoan the commercialization of the holiday then bellyache when a commercial entity won't further commercialize it.

I didn't see a doctrinal statement on the official AFA site (afa.net), but I do listen to my local AFA affiliated radio station (AFR Radio). The network is decidedly Evangelical in its content. AFA and AFR (Focus on the Family, etc.) like so many ministries today feel compelled to go to the mat and spend their time, energy and money fighting silly things like a secular BUSINESS like Sam's Club using the rather inoffensive word "holiday".  

I don't expect Sam's Club to take a stance on the issues truly important to Christianity (justification, sanctification, etc.) so why should I expect them to recognize a holiday that is relatively insignificant (of course the incarnation is significant, but the "holiday season" itself is of no eternal consequence to the faith of Evangelicals)?

I don't expect Shoe Show to take a stand on the efficacy of the work of Christ on Calvary. Nor do I need McDonalds to finally come down on the issue of the canonicity of the Book of Tobit. Who is waiting for JC Penny to take a position on the hot-button issues of baptismal regeneration and predestination? What next, Catholics demanding Target recognize the Feast of the Assumption?

The things that rile Christians these days... sheez! Declare the evangelical gospel "anathema" and it's Kum Bah Yah time. Declare an anathema for denying indulgences (remember those?) and we'll look the other way (Vat II). But use "holiday" instead of "Christmas" and suddenly the faith is threatened.

Silly. Absolutely silly. And a colossal waste of time and money.

Might I suggest we send Chuck Colson to Sam's Club to sign a statement pretending that we won't notice their exclusion of the word "Christmas" if they'll ignore us when we get in the wrong checkout line.
 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kerry Loses Election But Wins Argument

Forever on Defense
 
If there is one thing that history teaches us (check that), that history screams very loudly and very clearly, is that you cannot fight a defensive war forever.

On one level I can say that the terrorists have won. I had to fly this past week and I spent my time making sure I didn't have any liquids on me, making sure that no object on my keychain could be construed as a weapon and suspiciously eyeing every other passenger at the airport. As the terrorists continue to find loopholes in the system, travel will become increasingly more unpleasant than it already is.

Nineteen men five years ago have made millions of passengers uptight ever since.

We're just sitting back waiting to be hit. We're waiting for North Korea to nuke some US property. We're waiting for Iran to nuke Israel or blow up more Amreicans in Iraq via their many proxies. We're waiting for Hezbollah and Hamas to regroup and strike again. All this while TSA members sift through my wife's unmentionables at the airport.

Why are we here? Well, first and foremost, sometime around 1970 the press decided that the death of any American soldier was unacceptable... and we've since come along for the ride. 2600 military deaths in Iraq in over three years? That is phe-nom-i-nal. Couple that with no major terrorist attacks in the US and countless Islamofascists killed way way way over there and we should be emboldened to take aim at Iran, Syria and North Korea.

But where do we find ourselves? We find President Bush adoting the KERRY PLAN FOR WORLD PEACE. That is, we pressured Israel to stop killing terrorists because other terrorist states were upset by the war. Then we decided that we can't move forward unless the French and the UN tell us we can.

The Bush Doctrine is dead. Kerry has apparently won the argument.

What happened? We have lost the will to fight. Dying for an ideal and for the sake of the future is no longer considered noble. We'd rather sit back and watch three little rogue nations rule our lives.... ignorantly hoping that talks with madmen will end the struggle. And don't be fooled, our freedom of movement has been altered, our ecomony has been altered, our very way of life has been altered. The Iranian president flinches and the stock market reacts. Syria threatens (threatens!) the UN and somebody actually cares.

We have an administration that is more concerned with the editorial pages of US and European newspapers than it is with restoring the American way of life. We have a population that is content to slowly watch the world we knew implode and die so long as the death is a slow one.

If this nation continues to fear going on the offensive, the war of attrition with a billion people who have no fear of death can only end up as all such efforts, in defeat.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »